top of page

SafecomLink Pactor - Amateur Radio Forum

Public·22 members

What is the best procedure for timing QSY after making a connection?

After I initiate and successfully connect to another station, I usually send the slot qsy request right away. The program wants you to qsy within 10 seconds. If you do that before receiving a confirmation from the other station, do you leave them behind on the CF? This may only be an issue at lower SWR (below -10) when things are slow. I am not sure how long to wait on CF for the confirmation or will everything work out if you just go ahead and QSY right away after sending the request? What has worked best for you?

73

Harley

63 Views

It's best for both stations to let the system perform the QSY automatically after the 10-second countdown. This gives the initiating station enough time to receive the ACK before both sides switch frequencies.


What I sometimes see is that the receiving station approves the QSY invitation almost immediately. As a result, its system switches before it has enough time to send the ACK on the Calling Frequency (CF). The initiating station never receives the ACK, assumes the invitation was not accepted, and continues retransmitting the QSY request on the CF.


For this reason, it's strongly recommended to wait for the full 10-second countdown and let the system handle the QSY automatically. If something does go wrong, the system includes a QSY recovery mechanism that automatically brings both stations back to the Calling Frequency within 20–30 seconds.

Calling all Pactor & HF Digital Enthusiasts!

For those of you who prefer the structured, deep-dive email and forum experience of Groups.io, we’ve just launched a brand-new space for you: Pactor-NextGen!


Join us here: https://groups.io/g/Pactor-NextGen


Yes, there is already an established Pactor group out there, but this new space is entirely focused on Pactor innovation.


It’s a direct callout to the forward-thinkers, the developers, the tinkerers, and everyone who wants to see this incredible technology advance to new horizons rather than staying locked in the past.


While I’m sharing this here in the SafecomLink community, I want to make it absolutely clear: this group is platform-agnostic and open to EVERYONE. This isn't a closed ecosystem, it is a collaborative space for anyone using any tool in the Pactor world, including:

  • Winlink


45 Views

Running SafecomLink for Pactor on Linux

Our dear community member, Matjaz Kmet (S57MK), has done an excellent job creating a step-by-step guide for configuring a PACTOR modem and SafecomLink on a Linux machine.


You can find the guide here:


https://www.safecomlink.com/post/running-safecomlink-for-pactor-on-linux


Many thanks to Matjaz for sharing his expertise and creating this valuable resource for the community. Great work!



45 Views

Crickets from the US

Anyone out there in the US that's playing with SafecomLink besides me? I'm on the west coast and all I hear is crickets. Successful contacts anyone?

49 Views
harley
Jun 05

I am a West Coaster but currently using it in Norway.

Harley KN7H (temporarily LA/KN7H)

bottom of page